Why Are So Many Jews Leading Trump’s Impeachment Parade?

Donald Trump’s been one of the most pro-Israel and pro-Jewish presidents in American history.

“Indeed, when it comes to Israel and what truly matters to most non-leftist Jews worldwide, Trump has already secured a place as one of the most pro-Jewish presidents to inhabit the White House.” — Daniel Krygier, World Israel News

That said, a disproportionate number of leftist and moderate Jews have been working feverishly over the past two-and-a-half years to impeach him.

The first article of impeachment was filed in July 2017 by Brad Sherman a Jewish Democrat representative from California. Sherman accused the president of “obstructing investigations into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election.”

A month later, Steve Cohen, a Jewish Democrat Representative from Tennessee, filed articles of impeachment for comments President Trump made in the aftermath of the violent clash between far-left and far-right thugs at the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia.

In January 2018, Jewish Billionaire Tom Steyer decided to forego a run for president and campaign for Trump’s impeachment instead.

“I said last year that I’m willing to do whatever I can to protect our country from this reckless, lawless and dangerous president. Therefore, I will be dedicating 100 percent of my time, effort and resources working for Mr. Trump’s impeachment and removal from office. I am not running for president at this time.” — Tom Steyer, Jewish Billionaire

Steyer poured 30 million (of the 50 million dollars he spent in 2018 to impeach Trump) into his super PAC, NextGen America to help Democrats take over the House of Representatives. Steyer dumped another $40 million into his impeachment efforts this year.

Initially only leftist Jews called for the president’s impeachment. To get the impeachment proceedings in the House of Representatives off the ground, moderate, centrist, and pro-Israel Jews had to board the impeachment train, too.

In July 2019, Jewish Democrat Representative Eliot Engel of New York, an influential moderate and leader among pro-Israel lawmakers, joined the left in calling for Trump’s impeachment.

Then another influential mainstream Jewish Democrat from New York, Nita Lowey, chairwoman of the Appropriations Committee, added her voice to the chorus calling for impeachment.

Engel and Lowery had opened the door for other moderate and centrist Jewish Democrats to join the impeachment chorus. Representatives Max Rose of New York, Elissa Slotkin of Michigan, and Elaine Luria of Virginia voiced their support for an impeachment inquiry in the House.

Luria’s support for impeachment was noteworthy because she belonged to a group of moderate, centrist, and pro-Israel Jewish Democrat lawmakers who initially opposed the impeachment of the president.

To explain her about-face, Luria released an unusual video that was most likely directed towards Jews. The video shows Luria multiple times holding as a prop a white Hebrew bible inscribed with her name reciting the oath of office.

Tom Steyer wasn’t the only Jewish billionaire dumping his money into impeachment efforts. Billionaire left-wing activist George Soros also bankrolled the impeachment drive.

Soros has “literally paid the bills” for Norm Eisen who questioned witnesses during the House Judiciary Committee’s impeachment hearings. Soros also backed a “dark money” group‘s multi-million-dollar ad blitz urging swing-district Republican representatives to support the Jewish-lead impeachment inquiry.

The prominence of Jews leading and cheering the impeachment parade of a duly elected President hasn’t gone completely unreported in the U.S. The Religion News Service (RNS) did point out and identified the “disproportionate number of Jewish actors in this drama.”

Nonetheless, RNS is the exception. America’s media hasn’t acknowledged the impeachment’s “elephant in the room.”

It’s readily apparent that Jews are the driving force to remove Trump from the presidency, and it’s also apparent that only Jews in the Israeli media can say it.

Israeli news outlets have not shied away from the “elephant in the room.”  The articles below have appeared in The Jewish Telegraph Agency, The Times of Israel, Haaretz, The Jerusalem Post, and Forward respectively:

The Trump-Ukraine controversy, and the Jews involved, explained

The Tell: The Jewish players in impeachment

The Jewish players in the Trump impeachment hearings

These Jewish Lawmakers Helped Open the Door to a Trump Impeachment Inquiry

Jewish Democrats express support for impeachment inquiry against Trump

The Jews Of The Impeachment Showdown: A Visual Guide

Why are so many Jewish activists, politicians, representatives, lawyers, ambassadors, and committee chairmen and witnesses trying to impeach the President of the United States and overturn the 2016 election?

And why does the chairman of the Jewish Democratic Council of America blame the president for the increased violence and antisemitism in the country; and why does nearly 60% of Jews blame him for the terrorist attacks on the synagogues in Pittsburgh and San Diego?

It’s not bigoted or racist to ask questions and look for answers to find out what’s going on. If there were a disproportionate number of Mormons, Muslims, or Masons doing what the Jews are doing to oust a sitting president, Americans would take notice.

When all three committee chairman, their lawyers, their witnesses, and nearly everyone involved in these impeachment hearings are Jewish, it’s not anti-Semitic but patriotic to call attention to the “elephant in the room.”

 

Read Full Post »

Nancy Pelosi’s Ties to California Corruption

The video below shows the political corruption in California, which is a failed state because of the Democrat Party. It has the highest income taxes, the most illegal aliens, and the largest homeless population in the nation. Voter fraud keeps the leftist Democrat Party in power and will continue to do so in perpetuity. 

California is a lost cause, and Illinois and New York are not far behind following in its footsteps. Soon Florida and Texas will join them, and when they do, the Democrat Party will control the Electoral College, i.e. the presidency will go to the Democrat in perpetuity, which means the party will control the appointments for who sits on the Supreme Court and who interprets the Constitution. 

California is microcosm of what the United States will become once the Democrat Party gains control of the three branches of government again. 

So when you vote in 2020, use this rule of thumb: the worst Republican is better than the best Democrat. 

For more information, see

FBI Files: Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi’s Father Thomas D’Alesandro Jr. Was “Constant Companion” Of Notorious Mobster Benjamin Magliano

Read Full Post »

Moore Accuser’s Former Lawyer’s Firm has Ties to Democrat Party

Moore Accuser’s Former Lawyer’s Firm has Ties to Democrat Party

By Jerry A. Kane

Leigh Corfman, the main accuser of Alabama Republican Senate candidate Roy Moore, was, until recently, represented by a lawyer whose law firm has ties to the state’s Democrat Party.

Corfman, who has accused Moore of molesting her 38 years ago in 1979 when she was 14 years old, had been, until very recently, represented by K. Edward Sexton II, a partner in the law firm Gentle Turner Sexton and Harbison LLC.

Sexton’s Alabama law firm, located in Riverchase, an upscale section of the Birmingham suburb, Hoover, is known for mediating and administering multi-billion and multi-million dollar mass tort and class action cases.

The eight-lawyer firm is headed by founding partner Edgar Gentle III, the current Treasurer of the state’s Democrat Party. Gentle’s professional biography says he’s created and administered over $2 Billion in settlements and lists Sexual Assault Civil Tort among his several practice areas.

So, how does 53 year-old Corfman, who has a history of financial problems and bankruptcies and works as a customer service representative at a payday loan business, end up with a lawyer from a firm that specializes in the administration of mass tort and class action settlements and is tied at the hip to the state’s Democrat Party?

For that matter, why would Sexton or his law firm take a case like Corfman’s in the first place? And if he or his firm was paid for services rendered, who paid the bill? And why, pray tell, is he no longer representing her; in fact, when exactly did Sexton become Corfman’s lawyer to being with?

The Washington Post (WAPO) was first to publish Corfman’s unproven allegations against Roy Moore. The Post’s story that featured Corfman’s salacious accusations was published November 9.

Also published November 9 was an AL.com article identifying, Eddie Sexton, as a Hoover attorney representing Corfman:

“An attorney for Leigh Corfman, whose story of a sexual encounter with Roy Moore when he was 32 and she was 14, broke today, said Corfman stands by her story.

Hoover attorney Eddie Sexton told AL.com that Corfman has wanted to publicly talk about the time in 1979 when Moore dated her, but never felt like it was the right time.”

In the November 9 AL.com piece, Sexton said that Corfman had been talking with WAPO reporters for several weeks before WAPO’s November 9 story appeared, which WAPO echoed in its November 9 story:

“Over the ensuing three weeks, two Post reporters contacted and interviewed the four women. All were initially reluctant to speak publicly but chose to do so after multiple interviews …”

In addition to Corfman, WAPO reporters also interviewed three other women, Wendy Miller, Debbie Wesson Gibson, and Gloria Thacker Deason for their November 9 story. None of these women accused Moore of inappropriate sexual contact, and to my knowledge, none of them had attorneys present when they told their stories to WAPO reporters.

Obviously, Sexton’s services had been retained before WAPO published its November 9 story. Questions of when Corfman retained the services of an attorney, or why she retained an attorney went unasked by WAPO reporters.

Corfman submitted an “open letter” published November 28 at AL.com. In it she echoed what her mother, Nancy Wells, had told Arron Klein of Breitbart News November 12.

“When the Washington Post approached me about what you [Moore] did to me as a child, I told them what happened …”

In their November 9 story, WAPO reporters admit that the four women were initially reluctant to speak to WAPO reporters, and  that it was WAPO reporters who sought out the women and made the initial contact:

“Over the ensuing three weeks, two Post reporters contacted and interviewed the four women.”

If the women didn’t initiate contact with WAPO reporters, how did they learn of Moore’s alleged relationships with teenage girls?

“While reporting a story in Alabama about supporters of Moore’s Senate campaign, a Post reporter heard that Moore allegedly had sought relationships with teenage girls.”

Shazam! Serendipity, thy name is Bezos. Unreported 40-year-old allegations just fell out the mouths of Moore supporters to an all-ears WAPO reporter working on a story about Moore supporters during Moore’s Senate campaign.

Lady Luck wasn’t just smiling on WAPO reporters, she was grinning like Cheshire Cat. WAPO reporters didn’t say how they found the women to corroborate what the reporter had heard at the Moore rally?

It was yet another serendipitous find. Voilà! WAPO reporters just happened to stumble upon Corfman, a Republican supporter of Trump who voted for him for President in ’16, and was at that very moment ready to break 38 years of silence, lawyer up, and dump a ton of salacious allegations about Moore just a few weeks outside of a crucial Senate election. Eureka! The sleuths found the kill shot.

What would raise an eyebrow on most people regarding the timing of Corfman’s allegations was nothing more than a facial tic on the WAPO reporters. Corfman, the self-identified Republican and Trump supporter, could’ve come forth with her allegations a month earlier during the Republican primary when Moore was running against Luther Strange—who Trump supported, and that would’ve helped the Republican Party and the Trump agenda.

Instead, Corfman waited until Moore won the primary and was pitted against a pro-partial-birth abortion, gun grabbing leftist Democrat before coming out with her salacious allegations and putting a Republican incumbent’s Senate seat in play for the Democrat Party.

It must not have occurred to the WAPO reporters to ask why a Trump-supporting Republican would turn against her party and president to aid the Democrat Party and help elect a leftist Democrat.

WAPO reporters didn’t ask Corfman a lot of probing or relevant questions. Corfman told them that Moore had phoned her not long after they’d met in 1979 and that she had talked with Moore on her phone in her bedroom.

Telephones weren’t that commonplace in 14-year-old girls’ bedrooms back in ‘79, but the WAPO reporters didn’t seem to possess that knowledge and just took Corfman’s word for it.

But the truth came out when Breitbart’s Arron Klein interviewed Corfman’s mother who said that her daughter didn’t have a phone in her bedroom at the time.

Corfman also told the Post that she had met Moore at Alcott Road and Riley Street, which she said was “around the corner” from her mother’s house in Gadsden. Once again, the WAPO reporters took Corfman’s word for it and didn’t bother to check how far away from Corfman’s mother’s house those streets were.

As it turns out, the Alcott Road and Riley Street intersection was not just “around the corner”; it was almost a mile away, and, at the time, across a major thoroughfare.

Corfman told the Post that she first met Moore while sitting on a wooden bench with her mother outside a courtroom in Etowah County, Alabama. Moore, a 32 year-old assistant district attorney at the time, had an office down the hall from the courtroom.

She said that she had gone out with Moore twice. The first time he told her she was pretty and kissed her. The second time he touched her over her bra and underpants and guided her hand over his underwear to touch his penis.

Corfman said the encounters with Moore had caused her to become increasingly reckless as a teenager. She began drinking, taking drugs, having boyfriends, and attempted suicide when she was 16 years old.

“I felt responsible. I felt like I had done something bad. And it kind of set the course for me doing other things that were bad,” she said.

To verify Corfman’s allegations, WAPO reporters looked at divorce records from February 1979 and found that Corfman’s mother did attend a hearing at the courthouse. They also confirmed that Moore had an office down the hall from the courtroom. And that’s all the verification they needed to prove that Corfman was telling the truth.

Had the WAPO reporters spent a bit more time reading the court documents, they would have found only one court case for February 1979, and it occurred February 21. In that case, Corfman’s mother voluntarily relinquished custody of Corfman to her father.

The custody documents cite Corfman’s “disciplinary and behavioral problems” as the reason for the change of custody from Corfman’s mother to her father. Both parents agreed that 14-year-old Corfman would be better off living with her father. Based on these court documents, Corfman’s behavioral problems began before her alleged encounters with Moore.

Obviously, the WAPO reporters did not carefully vet Corfman or take pains to investigate her allegations. They really weren’t looking to verify the accuracy of Corfman’s story or to determine the truth of her allegations.

Their job was to create and craft a narrative that would successfully destroy Moore and keep him out of the Senate. They needed salacious allegations to push that narrative, and Corfman’s story had to appear credible and sound believable.

The credibility of Corfman’s allegations relies on her memory of 38-year-old events and her ability to accurately recount the details surrounding those events, and thus far she’s been inaccurate about several of those details. These inaccuracies undermine her salacious allegations as well as her overall credibility and character.

The Post reported that Corfman’s had three divorces, three bankruptcies, and multiple misdemeanor charges. And she admits that “There is no one here that doesn’t know that I’m not an angel.”

And several people from Alabama who say they know her would disagree. They have taken to Facebook and Twitter to say that Corfman has a history of making false sexual allegations. According to their posts, Corfman has falsely alleged that several pastors at various churches have made sexual advances toward her.

Now that Moore accuser Beverly Young Nelson came out today and admitted that she had forged a portion of the high school yearbook she and attorney Gloria Allred used as proof of her salacious accusations against Moore, Corfman is now the last accuser standing.

WAPO’s November 9 bombshell piece was a created narrative crafted by WAPO reporters designed to destroy Roy Moore’s reputation and Senate candidacy.

Tuesday’s special election will determine whether or not they’ve succeeded. God help us if they do.

 

Read Full Post »

AMERICA’S FOOLS ON THE HILL

At a Tea Party rally opposing Secretary of State John F. Kerry’s Nuclear Agreement with Iran, the foremost state sponsor of terrorism in the world, Republican presidental candidate Donald Trump said that “We are led by very, very stupid people.”

AMERICA‘S LEADERS

(L-R) John Boehner, Joe Biden, Barack Hussein Obama, Mitch McConnell, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, and Andrew McCarthy

Thousands attended the rally held last week outside the Capitol in Washington, DC.

---

Read Full Post »

IDAHO INCIDENT RAISES CONCERNS OVER GOVERNMENT GUN CONFISCATION

Idaho Incident Raises Concerns Over Government Gun Confiscation

By Jerry A. Kane

When the Department of Veterans Affairs determines a veteran unable to take care of his financial affairs, it reports the assessment to the FBI’s National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS).

Once NICS gets the report, it labels the veteran “incapacitated,” which means that he along with his family members who live in the same household are barred by law from buying or owning firearms.

On July 30, 2015, Navy Veteran John Arnold of Priest River, Idaho, received a letter from the VA informing him that he is no longer allowed to purchase or own guns, and that “an inspector from an Idaho office of Veteran’s Affairs would be coming to his home in Priest River on August 6th to confiscate his firearms.” VA spokesman Bret Bowers said the agency’s benefits office in Salt Lake City had sent out the letter.

Last September the 70 year-old Arnold suffered a stroke and went to the VA for medical attention. After undergoing treatment, Arnold quickly recovered from the stroke, but an assessment conducted by the VA determined he could no longer handle his own finances. Arnold said that he has always taken care of his own finances and has continued to do so after recovering from the stroke.

When word got out that an inspector was coming to confiscate Arnold’s guns, Idaho Republican state Representative Heather Scott of Blanchard and about 100 area residents gathered outside the veteran’s home to prevent the inspector from taking them.

Scott spearheaded the effort, which attracted Washington state Representative Matthew Shea of Spokane Valley and County Sheriff Daryl Wheeler. Shea called the gathering a “defiance against tyranny” and Wheeler vowed that he’d stand guard “to make sure Mr. Arnold’s rights weren’t going to be breached.”

“I took an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution and uphold the laws of Idaho. This seemed appropriate to show my support,” Wheeler said.

Arnold said he was “thankful and amazed” by the number of people who showed up to stand with him and support his Second Amendment rights.

“It’s absolutely amazing and it gives you a new found hope that there are still people out there,” said Maria Bosworth, Arnold supporter.

The VA does have the authority to declare veterans incompetent to handle their financial affairs, which bars them from buying or owing firearms; but Bowers said his agency doesn’t have the authority to confiscate them.

The VA’s authority to bar veterans from buying and owning guns is being challenged by Second Amendment advocates. Recently U.S. Senator John Cornyn (R-TX) proposed a bill that would require court action before the VA can bar veterans who have been declared incompetent from buying guns.

Priest River, population 1,700, has been described as a community of strong Tea Party and Second Amendment supporters.

---

 

Read Full Post »

NRA BACKS GUN BACKGROUND CHECK LEGISLATION

NRA Backs Gun Background Check Legislation

By Jerry A. Kane

Senator John Cornyn, R-Texas, the Senate’s No. 2 Republican leader, introduced legislation today that would reward states for sending more information about residents with serious mental problems to the federal background check system for firearms purchasers.

The proposed legislation is being backed by the National Rifle Association. Jennifer Baker, spokeswoman for NRA legislative affairs, said the bill took “meaningful steps toward fixing the system and making our communities safer.”

Cornyn’s bill would increase grants under the government’s main law enforcement program by up to 5 percent for states that send the federal system at least 90 percent of their records on people with serious mental problems.

States providing less data could see their grants from a broad range of justice programs penalized by the same amounts, at the attorney general’s discretion.

So what criteria will the Uni-party use to determine a “serious” mental problem, and how long before it mandates what type of psychiatric exam everyone must get to purchase a gun?

Didn’t Hussein I (peace be upon him) and his minions suggest that fundamentalist Christians and staunch conservatives have serious mental problems? BTW, this latest assault on individual liberty and the 2^nd Amendment is headed by a Republican senator and the NRA, and not Charles Schumer and Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence.

Communist Goals (1963) Congressional Record–Appendix, pp. A34-A35 January 10, 1963:

38. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].
39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.

Some children who exhibit negative, defiant, disobedient and hostile behavior toward adults and authority have been diagnosed with Oppositional Defiant Disorder. For a child to receive an ODD diagnosis, the behaviors must occur for at least six months.

Right now it’s only children who are diagnosed with ODD, but it’s not hard to imagine that eventually the parameters of the disorder will expand to include adults.

For more on the NRA sell out, see No. 2 Senate Republican proposing gun background check bill.

Read Full Post »

IRAN DEAL WOULD REQUIRE US TO DEFEND IRAN AGAINST ISRAEL

Iran Deal Would Require US to Defend Iran against Israel

By Jerry A. Kane

While discussing the Iran deal on the Today Show, the Secretary of State and husband of Teresa Hines, John “Lurch” Kerry said that an Israeli preemptive strike on Iran would be “a huge mistake with grave consequences for Israel.”

Kerry tried to downplay concerns that clauses in the Iran deal would require the US to secure Iran’s nuclear facilities and defend the terrorist nation against an Israeli preemptive attack.

“[F]aced with a choice between defending Israel and defending the Iran deal, it is become clear that under some circumstances, the Obama administration would choose the latter. That is a radically different position from the one Obama took in public just a short time before formal negotiations began,” Breitbart News.

Republican Senator Marco Rubio also pointed out that part of the Iran deal could force the US into the position of helping Iran defend itself against Israel.

“At the last minute, they [Iran negotiators] were able to get all sorts of outrageous concessions including … we have to help Iran protect itself against sabotage. If any other country tries to undermine their nuclear program, we have to help them defend themselves against Israel, Egypt, Saudis, our own allies.”

The Iran deal also has been roundly criticized in the Israeli media.

“One of the clauses in the nuclear deal reached between world powers and Iran last week guarantees that the world powers will assist Iran in thwarting attempts to undermine its nuclear program,” Israel Hayom.

A preemptive strike against Iran would not be the first time Israel had preemptively attacked a country without U.S. support. Ronald Reagan condemned Israel’s attack against Iraq in 1981, and George W. Bush opposed Israel’s strike against Syria in 2007.

In the past, Hussein I (peace be upon him) has leaked Israeli attack plans to Iran thus neutralizing Israel’s preemptive capacity. However, with the concessions made in the Iran deal, he could mandate something far worse for Israel.

Unfortunately, there are countless traitors within the American political community who speak out of both sides of their mouths. And some of the fork-tongued politicians are Jews who claim they support Israel, yet they are in reality self-hating, Kapo Jews who would feel no remorse if the Jews in Israel were wiped out by the Iranians.

For more on the story, see U.S., Israel on Collision Course if Iran Deal Goes Through, Marco Rubio says Iran deal means we have to help defend Iran from Israel or other allies, and Nuclear deal will see powers ‘help Iran protect facilities’.

Read Full Post »

WHY WON’T HANNITY AND LEVIN PROMOTE ANTI-ESTABLISHMENT SENATE CANDIDATES IN GOP PRIMARIES

This 12:44 youtube video is taken from The Millstone Report web cast at the Resistance Radio Network.

The show aired Friday, March 28, 2014. TMR is broadcast live M-F from 10:00 am — noon on channel 2.

To see the full two-hour show, go to the Ought to be Headlines web page. Join the resistance and make a difference before it’s too late.

 

 

If Sean Hannity and Mark Levin aren’t tools of the establishment, they would be on a crusade promoting the anti-establishment candidates in the upcoming GOP primaries.

I’m not talking about a casual mention of a particular Senate race here and there, or a rant against one of the establishment’s candidates; I’m talking about interviewing these largely unknown candidates and dropping their names with increased frequency with each approaching primary. Name recognition is key if these unknown candidates are to have a fighting chance against the well-known, well-financed establishment incumbents.

If Hannity and Levin had integrity and the courage of their professed convictions, they would be repentant for their wholehearted endorsement Orin Hatch, a card-carrying member of the permanent political class and more RINO than Bob Bennett, who lost Utah’s 2010 primary to Mike Lee.

To jog your memory, Hatch was headed for defeat in 2012, but Mark Levin and Sean Hannity intervened to save his bacon. They endorsed Hatch, interviewed and promoted him as a stalwart conservative on their shows, and relentlessly attacked Dan Liljenquist, Hatch’s challenger, who in truth was an actual conservative tough on fiscal issues, illegal immigration, and the GOP establishment.

Levin was the more ruthless of the two. He mercilessly attacked FreedomWorks and its head Dick Armey for prompting a radical, open-borders, pro-amnesty position, and viciously smeared Liljenquist in spite of the fact that Hatch was an original sponsor of the open-borders DREAM Act.

Levin endorsed Hatch without reservation knowing Hatch had been in DC since 1976; had promoted SCHIP (Obamacare for Children), TARP, the Law of the Sea Treaty, and Medicare Part D; and had voted to confirm leftists Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Ben Bernanke, Timothy Geithner, Eric Holder, and Cass Sunstein.

“I endorsed Orrin Hatch a year ago and will continue to do so,” Levin proclaimed.

Hatch’s voting record called into question his ability and desire to uphold the Constitution and defend liberty and freedom, but Levin was undeterred. He doubled down to endorse and support the mascot for big-spending Beltway entrenched incumbents who routinely crossed the aisle to promote and pass the Democrats’ destructive policies.

Hatch was the antithesis of the Tea Party spirit. Following his vote in support of Eric Holder as Attorney General, he said, “I like Barack Obama and I want to help him if I can.” Hatch proved he was part of the overall problem and epitomized everything Levin said he opposed on his radio talk show; yet, Levin gave Hatch unwavering support.

Levin has a reputation for being a constitutional scholar and a solid Reagan conservative and his endorsement of the six-term senator with a big-government voting record and nearly four decades of costly progressive partnerships carried a lot of clout with the tea party and the conservative grassroots. His endorsement gave Hatch more of the trust of Utah’s Republican primary voters in one of the nation’s reddest states.

Primaries are where the fight for the soul of the GOP takes place. Primaries are where the GOP’s RINO/neocon establishment should be ousted. Primaries are where the grass roots lets the party know that “we’re mad as hell, and we’re not taking it anymore.”

Sean Hannity’s and Mark Levin’s endorsements have enormous credibility, but they put their shows’ ratings and personal interests ahead of their professed beliefs. The truth is what they say and do adheres to management, advertising, and FCC guidelines. That’s the way it is, and it’s naive to think otherwise.

Looking to talk radio for heroes and champions is like looking for love in all the wrong places. People who do it are setting themselves up for a major letdown.

But don’t take my word for it; use the available social media and ask your conservative warriors if they’ll go all out to help these anti-establishment senate candidates get the name recognition and raise the money to rid the GOP of its RINOs.

If you take me up on my challenge be prepared for great disappointment and the bloom to fall off the rose.

Read Full Post »

DON’T PLAY NICE; FIGHT FIRE WITH FIRE

This 18:48 youtube video is taken from The Millstone Report web cast at the Resistance Radio Network.

The show aired Monday, March 10, 2014. TMR is broadcast live M-F from 10:00 am — noon on channel 2.

See the full two-hour show on the Ought to be Headlines web page, and the join the resistance. Make a difference before it’s too late.

 

Read Full Post »

Latest Commentary

The Tea Party Express Is Useless

By Jerry A. Kane

Democrats control the executive and legislative branches of the federal government, and they have been relentlessly forcing socialism down the craw of the American people because progressives are in total control of the Democrat Party.

To solve the problem, simply vote out the Democrats and strip the power from the progressives. So what in the name of Sam Hill are the leaders of the Tea Party Express trying to prove by endorsing Idaho Democrat Walt Minnick for Congress?

Although little love is lost between Minnick and his fellow Democrats in DC and Idaho, the truth is he supports big government programs, not limited government, and isn’t the growth of federal government the real source of frustration for the tea party faithful? 

Minnick voted against the resolution to remove Charlie Rangel as chairman of the powerful House Ways and Means Committee for ethics violations and against the Republican Study Committee’s (RSC’s) blueprint to restrain spending and to reduce the budget.

But the indelible stain on Minnick is that he voted for Nancy Pelosi as speaker in 2008. His vote for the stalwart progressive proves he can’t be trusted. He’ll get in line like Bart Stupak and fall on the sword if his vote is required to advance the progressive agenda.

The idea of party loyalty suggests that a conservative Republican will do more to stop the progressive onslaught than a “conservative” Democrat, so why then would the Tea Party Express leaders endorse an Idaho Democrat over conservative Republicans for an important congressional seat?

Perhaps the leaders are so inept that they can’t piece together how the machinations of Pelosi and Harry Reid control their fellow Democrats to advance Brother O’s progressive agenda, or they don’t view the progressive one-party rule as a problem.

Read Full Post »