Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for September, 2015

This is an excellent parody. Well done, Tim Donovan. Ms. Rodham Clinton will be guzzling Jack and pitchin’ lamps if she sees this one.

BTW, the title “Klintonerdämmerung is a play on the German word “Götterdämmerung,” which means Twilight of the Gods. And of course, Clintons is spelled with a K.

“When stepped on, the worm curls up. That is a clever thing to do. Thus it reduces its chances of being stepped on again. In the language of morality: humility.”—Friedrich Nietzsche, Maxims and Arrows, Twilight of the Idols


Klintonerdämmerung

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

Whom God Means to Destroy, He First Makes Undiscerning

By Jerry A. Kane

Delegates prepared to take a group photo after the Iran nuclear deal was announced in Vienna

Delegates prepared to take a group photo after the Iran nuclear deal was announced in Vienna

While reading that Jewish Americans, Jewish clergy, and two-thirds of Jewish politicians are solidly embracing the Iran nuclear deal:

“[T]hey strongly believe the agreement offers the best hope of keeping Iran from getting a nuclear weapon“;

“We believe such opposition is misplaced, mired in the past, and is missing an opportunity to shape a more hopeful future“;

an ancient heathen proverb came to mind, “Those whom the gods wish to destroy they first make mad.”

With apologies to Zeus and other Olympian gods in the ancient Greek religion, I offer a more updated, Judeo-Christian variant, “Whom God means to destroy, He first makes undiscerning.”

“For thou hast hid their heart from understanding:” Job 17:4 (KJV)

Discernment is the intellectual ability to apply a general principle or standard to evaluate a particular person, group, event, or idea correctly, i.e., the ability to distinguish good from evil, right from wrong, and truth from deceit.

“Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!” Isaiah 5:20 (KJV)

In a nutshell, discernment is from God, and sometimes He withholds it by sending deceitful, lying spirits to confuse leaders and prevent them from making correct judgments, so that He can destroy those He means to destroy.

“I saw the Lord sitting upon his throne, and all the host of heaven standing on his right hand and on his left. And the Lord said, Who shall entice Ahab king of Israel, that he may go up and fall at Ramothgilead? …

Then there came out a spirit, and stood before the Lord, and said, I will entice him. … I will go out, and be a lying spirit in the mouth of all his prophets. And the Lord said, Thou shalt entice him, and thou shalt also prevail: go out, and do even so.

Now therefore, behold, the Lord hath put a lying spirit in the mouth of these thy prophets, and the Lord hath spoken evil against thee.”—2 Chronicles 18:18-22 (KJV)

In King Lear Shakespeare wrote, “Tis the times’ plague, when madmen lead the blind” iv.1.46. American Jews are blind; their leaders are mad, despising discernment and wisdom. Their reluctance to render moral judgments to distinguish good from evil prove it. American Jews have abandoned logic and reason, and their only success is in making immoral, irrational judgments.

On Twitter, the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, Khamenei said that talks with the United States were a “means of infiltration and imposition of their wills.”

But American Jews could care less what the Iranian Supreme Leader has to say. They’d much rather adhere to the advice of a Yiddish proverb, “A bad peace is better than a good war,” than heed the dire warnings of a Hebrew prophet:

“For they have healed the hurt of the daughter of my people slightly, saying, Peace, peace; when there is no peace.”—Jeremiah 8:11 (KJV)

In signing onto the Iran nuclear deal, American Jews have followed the counsel of Hushai over the advice of Ahithophel:

“And Absalom and all the men of Israel said, The counsel of Hushai the Archite is better than the counsel of Ahithophel. For the LORD had appointed to defeat the good counsel of Ahithophel, to the intent that the LORD might bring evil upon Absalom.”—2 Samuel 17:14 (KJV)

The Iran nuclear deal will guarantee that “the Jewish state will be hounded until it is destroyed.”

Well, he’s surrounded by pacifists who all want peace

They pray for it nightly that the bloodshed must cease

Now, they wouldn’t hurt a fly. To hurt one they would weep

They lay and they wait for this bully to fall asleep

He’s the neighborhood bully.

 

 

Read Full Post »

Perky Katie Couric separately interviewed both Carly Fiorina and Ted Cruz about global cooling-warming/climate change, and the contrast is striking.

Ted Cruz and Carly Fiorina

Ted Cruz and Carly Fiorina

Couric began questioning Ted Cruz with the statement, “97% of scientists agree that global warming is manmade.”

Cruz responded saying that the “97% of scientists” claim is based on a discredited study and that there hasn’t been any global warming in 17 years. “It’s not happening,” Cruz said.

Then Cruz talked about how the media pushed “Global Cooling” on us in the 1970’s, and whether it’s global cooling or global warming, the basic motive behind it is always the same: about increased government control of the economy. And then Cruz said that liberals changed the name to “climate change”, so they could always claim there was a problem regardless of whether it got hotter or colder. Cruz further said that the Democrats are abandoning union workers in favor of environmentalists, creating an opening for Republicans.

So Cruz started with a question meant to put him on the defensive, and turned it around to (a) disprove global warming (b) explain how it is scam used by the government to control us and (c) turn it into an opening to attract union voters. And he did it with a manner that was gentle and friendly and smart. …

When Couric asked Carly Fiorina if she thought man-made global warming was a problem, her response was quite telling:

[Fiorina] hemmed and hawed … that it wasn’t a problem compared to fighting ISIS and other issues, but didn’t want to answer the basic question. She also said that “a single nation acting [alone can make no difference at all]….” She says we have to focus on innovation, like clean coal. But she doesn’t answer the basic question until finally at the end, when asked for the fourth or fifth time, Carly admits that “climate change” is real [issue], just not as important as other issues.

Carly’s interview was bad for several reasons. First, she looked evasive on answering the basic, simple question of whether man-made climate change is real, and she looked evasive because she was evasive. Not good. Secondly, she got the answer wrong. As we all know, there has been no global warming for 17 or 18 years. Thirdly, while she correctly stated that the US could not solve the “problem” alone, she bought into the Left’s argument that there is a problem. She accepted the premise of their argument, and once she does that, she operates on the defensive. (Emphasis mine) After watching that interview a low-information voter might think “Well, even Republicans agree it’s real, now I have to figure out who is better on this issue.”

The neo-conservative National Review praised Fioria‘s global-warming answers in her interview with Couric.

For the candidates’ global-warming interviews on youtube, see Katie Couric Interviews Sen. Ted Cruz on Climate Change and Carly Fiorina makes mincemeat of interviewer Katie Couric – Climate change.

For more of the two commentaries, see What happens when Ted Cruz and Carly Fiorina are compared head to head? and Carly Fiorina Shows How to Address the Left on Climate Change.

Read Full Post »

clintons final for post

WorldNetDaily’s Myra Adams sat down with Roger Stone to discuss his forthcoming book, The Clintons’ War on Women.

“Clinton’s apologists will try to dismiss it as “old news.” News is not “old” to those who never heard it. The book … is the true story of serial rape, intimidation, violence, terror tactics, drugs, lies, greed, cover-up and ambition,” said Roger Stone, author, pundit, and political operative.

In the interview, Stone describes his soon-to-be-released book as “the definitive expose on Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton, and refers to the former first family as “the penicillin-resistant syphilis of our political system.”

WND: Recently in Politico, you [Roger Stone] described your forthcoming book … as “The definitive expose’ on Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton. Raw, shocking and true.”

Is your description just hype to stimulate pre-sales since the book will not be released until Oct. 13, or are you and your co-author Robert Morrow really breaking new ground that will make headlines and possibly impact the 2016 race?

ROGER STONE: The mainstream media have suppressed the shocking truth about the Clintons and the way they have climbed over the backs of innocent women, men and children in their quest for power and wealth. Most people who read this book will learn shocking facts for the first time. Clinton’s apologists will try to dismiss it as “old news.” News is not “old” to those who never heard it. The book is not about Whitewater or Monica Lewinsky and Bill Clinton and a cigar. It is the true story of serial rape, intimidation, violence, terror tactics, drugs, lies, greed, cover-up and ambition. It’s blunt, ugly and shocking. It’s the definitive expose on Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton. Bill and Hillary Clinton are the penicillin-resistant syphilis of our political system.

WND: Can you tell readers (or at least hint) at some of the headlines this book is likely to generate?

ROGER STONE: Bill Clinton’s record of serial rape and how Hillary ran the terror campaign to intimidate his victims into silence or sign false denials. How Bill Clinton viciously bit the lower lips of his multiple rape victims as a signature bid to remain silent. Which co-president really gave the “go” order in Waco that killed 76 people, mostly women and 26 children? Bill’s abandoned African-American son and the non-existent DNA test reported by the Washington Post that supposedly exonerated Bill. A close-up look at the Clinton’s relationship with pedophile Jeff Epstein. Is Bill’s right-hand man, the now estranged Doug Band, the man who knows too much? How a recent DNA test shows Bill isn’t Chelsea biological father and who is. The identity of Bill Clinton’s real father (not the one listed in his Wiki profile).

Ay, caramba! That ain’t a whistle Stone’s blowin’; it’s a freakin’ fog horn.

For the complete interview, see Hillary covered up Bill’s rapes, sex with ‘underage girls’.

Read Full Post »

Did Club for Growth Try to Shakedown Trump?

By Jerry A. Kane

It looks like one of the preeminent tea-party-aligned groups has been outed for an attempted shakedown of GOP presidential front-runner Donald Trump.

According to Trump, the tax-cutting advocacy group has started running an attack ad campaign against him because he refused Club for Growth president David McIntosh’s request for a million-dollar donation.

Trump asked the group to release the letter McIntosh had sent him on June 2 requesting the donation. When the group didn’t respond to his request, Trump posted a copy of the letter on Twitter.

trump club for growth

Late last week the group began its media-assault on the Donald:

“What we’ve said to our members is that ‘Trump is a liability to the future of the nation,’ and we’ve asked them for support for Club for Growth Action to get that message out. We’re also doing research, like we do on candidates, into his economic policy positions. At this point, we haven’t taken anything off the table – be it TV ads or any other means – to expose Trump as not being an economic conservative, and as actually being the worst kind of politician,” said David McIntosh, Club for Growth President.

In response to the shakedown allegation, the Club for Growth tweeted that Trump had tried to buy influence with organization, and his attempt failed:

“[Trump] tries to buy influence w his $. Failed with Club”

The group’s anti-Trump ad campaign looks a lot like the “you don’t play, we make you pay” extortion schemes carried out by shakedown artists Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. Had Trump acquiesced and handed over the million-dollar “donation,” it’s doubtful McIntosh and the Club for Growth would have declared a “war on Trump.”

For more on the story, see Trump: ‘Phony’ Club for Growth ‘Total Hypocrites’ and Club for Growth declares war on Trump.

Read Full Post »

Judge Who Jailed Kentucky Clerk Has History of Imposting Homosexual Agenda in Public Schools

By Jerry A. Kane

The federal judge who held Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis in contempt and ordered her to jail for refusing to sign marriage licenses has on two occasions denied Christian students in Kentucky public schools their First Amendment rights by ordering them to undergo re-education training promoting the homosexual lifestyle against their religious objections.

Federal District Judge David Bunning

   Federal District Judge David Bunning

In 2003, Federal District Judge David Bunning ordered Boyd County education officials to implement training, which mandated school staff and students undergo diversity education principally “devoted to issues of sexual orientation and gender harassment.”

A number of students objected to being forced to watch a gaystapo propaganda video denouncing Christian views that opposed homosexuality as wrongheaded and proclaiming homosexuality as a safe, healthy, and fixed lifestyle that cannot be changed.

When it was discovered that students would be punished if they didn’t undergo the training their parents brought in the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) legal organization, which sued the Boyd County Board of Education.

In 2006, the gaystapo tool was back at it. Once again he tried to force Christian students to watch a gaystapo propaganda video promoting the homosexual lifestyle, and denying Christian students the ability to opt-out of the indoctrination training. Bunning ruled that an opt-out was unnecessary because the training didn’t mean that students would have to change their religious beliefs.

Bunning’s decision was overturned in October 2007 by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Court ruled that a Christian student could seek damages from the school district because the training Bunning imposed had “chilled” the student’s ability to express his Christian beliefs about homosexuality to his fellow students.

For more on the story, see Judge Who Jailed Kim Davis Ordered Students Who Opposed Homosexuality to Be Re-Educated.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts