Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for July 27th, 2010

Malik Zulu Shabazz, the anti-Semite and bigot, has been kept from prosecution due to the NAACP pulling strings inside Brother O’s Bread and Circuses Justice Department.  

Shabazz established his reputation as race healer and serious civil right leader back in 1994 during his introduction of Khallid Abdul Muhammad at Howard University:

Shabazz:  “Who is it that caught and killed Nat Turner?”

Audience:  “The Jews!”

Shabazz:  “Who is it that controls the Federal Reserve?”

Audience:  “The Jews!”

Shabazz:  “Who is it that has our entertainers . . . and our athletes in a vise grip?”

Audience:  “The Jews!”

Shabazz:  “We want to bring on a man who makes the Jews pee in their pants at night . . . my big brother, Dr. Khallid Muhammad!”

Shabazz’s infamous big brother, Dr. Khallid Muhammad who has since assumed room temperature, had achieved notoriety for cutting loose some racist zingers of his own:

“You see everybody always talk about Hitler exterminating six million Jews. That’s right. But don’t nobody ever ask what did they do to Hitler…They went in there, in Germany, the way they do everywhere they go, and they supplanted, they usurped…they had undermined the very fabric of the society. … 

When white folks can’t defeat you, they’ll always find some Negro, some boot-licking, butt-licking, bamboozled, half-baked, half-fried, sissified, punkified, pasteurized, homogenized N*gger that they can trot out in front of you. …  

The white man is not only practicing racism and Zionism and with the prostitution ring, the so-called Jew man with the Jew woman all over the world to make a few dollars. He is also practicing sexism. He’s a racist, he’s a Zionist, a sexist, and imperialist. He’s a no good bastard. He’s not a devil, the white man is the Devil”— Khalid Abdul Muhammad, Nation Of Islam and New Black Panther Party,

In the summer of 2000, the New Black Panther Party’s National Chairman spoke at the Reverend Al Sharpton’s “Redeem the Dream” rally in Washington, DC. Also participating in the rally were the NAACP, Congressman John Conyers, New York gubernatorial candidate Andrew Cuomo, and former NAACP President and Democrat Congressman, Kweisi Mfume.

Shabazz delivered on the theme that would be echoed eight years later by King Samir Shabazz, the baton-wielding Panther at the Philadelphia polling station, on the streets of Philadelphia: “You want freedom, you’re gonna have to kill some crackers!  You’re gonna have to kill some of their babies!”

“We in the New Black Panther Party led by our national chairman Khallid Abdul Muhammed have a black dream today. …  We have a black dream today of little black boys, little black girls, joining hands with other black youth and black students to organize, stop the violence in our communities, and unite against a common enemy.

We have a black dream today, and a vision today, of all of our people, black lawyers, black preachers, doctors, teachers, scientists, rap artists, gang members – all black people working for a common cause.

We have … a black dream today of self defense. … In the face of overwhelming odds against us we today have a vision of … a black dream that when we see caskets rolling in the black community… that we will see caskets and funerals in the community of our enemies as well.”— Malik Zulu Shabazz, National Chairman of the New Black Panther Party

Shabazz’s brand of racial healing involves “caskets and funerals in the community of our enemy,” i.e., racial healing occurs only after a race war. And to think that the NAACP, the Bread and Circuses administration, and their mainstream media lackeys are trying desperately to reinvent this vile racist as a serious civil rights leader.

Only in America!

For more on the Shabazz story, see New Black Panther Party Leader Video: ‘We Will See Caskets and Funerals in the Community of our Enemy’ by Rusty Weiss

I.M. Kane

Read Full Post »

In the June 14, 2010, story “Islamic Sharia Law to Be Banned in, ah, Oklahoma,” ABC News reporter Joel Siegel scoffed at the Oklahoma referendum prohibiting the courts from using sharia law in their decisions, as if the state’s referendum were a waste of time.

“Legal experts contacted by ABC News said they did not know of one instance of a judge in the U.S. invoking sharia in rendering a decision.”—Joel Siegel

However, Jihad Watch.org exposed the limited knowledge of ABC’s legal “experts.”

According to Jihad Watch, a New Jersey judge found a Muslim man not guilty of forcing his wife to have sex with him. The judge ruled the man should be excepted from the State’s criminal law due to his religious beliefs.

“This court does not feel that, under the circumstances, that this defendant had a criminal desire to or intent to sexually assault or to sexually contact the plaintiff when he did. The court believes that he was operating under his belief that it is, as the husband, his desire to have sex when and whether he wanted to, was something that was consistent with his practices and it was something that was not prohibited.”

In other words, the Muslim husband acted in accordance with his belief in sharia law; therefore, he did not commit a crime because his desire to have sex was “consistent with his practices” which were “not prohibited,” i.e., the judge determined sharia law trumps New Jersey criminal law.

An appellate court eventually overturned the judge’s outrageous decision, yet this case escaped the purview of the legal experts contacted by ABC News.

For more on the New Jersey judge’s sharia compliant ruling, see “Sharia in New Jersey: Muslim husband rapes wife, judge sees no sexual assault because Islam forbids wives to refuse sex” by Jihad Watch and “Cultural Defense Accepted as to Nonconsensual Sex in New Jersey Trial Court, Rejected on Appeal” by Eugene Volokh

I.M. Kane

Read Full Post »