Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for July 16th, 2010

“Any health care funding plan that is just, equitable, civilized, and humane must, must redistribute wealth from the richer among us to the poorer and the less fortunate. Excellent health care is by definition redistributional.”—Dr. Donald Berwick, Brother O’s appointed head of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) 

Decisions by CMS shape American medicine, and Brother O’s “recess appointment” of Donald Berwick to direct the agency will revolutionize the design and purpose of America’s medical system.

Please don’t put your faith in market forces. It’s a popular idea: that Adam Smith’s invisible hand would do a better job of designing care than leaders with plans can.“—Dr. Donald Berwick 

Berwick praises the UK’s system of socialized medicine for being universal, accessible, excellent, generous, hopeful, confident, joyous, and just. Conversely, he denounces America’s health care system for being politically unaccountable and fragmented within the “darkness of private enterprise.”  

“I cannot believe that the individual health care consumer can enforce through choice the proper configurations of a system as massive and complex as health care. That is for leaders to do.”—Dr. Donald Berwick

CMS is the world’s second largest insurance company after the UK’s National Health Service (NHS), and Berwick’s fondness for NHS will most assuredly lead him to apply its socialist ideas and rationing system to CMS, which will have massive ramifications on Medicare and Medicaid recipients, hospitals, and doctors.

“I am romantic about the NHS; I love it. All I need to do to rediscover the romance is to look at health care in my own country.”—Dr. Donald Berwick 

Berwick is not so much an ideologue as he is a true believer in the ability and efficiency of government technocrats to direct health care. Berwick believes that having technocrats assemble and analyze reams of data will lead to system wide improvements in America’s health-care system, in spite of the fact that all too often such analyses are based on unreliable data, which results in enormous waste, fraud, and abuse.

That the Obama White House would try to push this past public scrutiny with a recess appointment says more about Barack Obama than it does Dr. Berwick. … Within Mr. Obama’s circle they all think like this. Defeat Dr. Berwick, and they will send up 50 more who would pursue the same goals.—Daniel Henninger

Brother O, Berwick, and the host of Marxist ideologues, Maoists, communists and socialists in the Bread and Circuses administration have assumed their philosopher-king roles, determining and implementing what is best for Americans without informing or persuading them before hand.

You see, that’s how America’s new totalitarianism paradigm works now in Washington.

I.M. Kane


The clip below is an excerpt of Dr. Donald Berwick’s 2008 speech in the UK about why a bureaucrat-run, single-payer health care system with rationing and wealth redistribution is vastly superior to health care based on competition and consumer choice. 

Donald Berwick on Redistributing Wealth 2:15 Video

Berwick’s full speech can be viewed here.


 

Berwick: Bigger Than Kagan

By Daniel Henninger

If the American people want the health-care world Dr. Berwick wishes to give them, that’s their choice. But they must be given that choice.

Barack Obama’s incredible “recess appointment” of Dr. Donald Berwick to head the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) is probably the most significant domestic-policy personnel decision in a generation. It is more important to the direction of the country than Elena Kagan’s nomination to the Supreme Court.

The court’s decisions are subject to the tempering influence of nine competing minds. Dr. Berwick would direct an agency that has a budget bigger than the Pentagon. Decisions by the CMS shape American medicine.

Dr. Berwick’s ideas on the design and purpose of the U.S. system of medicine aren’t merely about “change.” They would be revolutionary.

One may agree with these views or not, but for the president to tell the American people they have to simply accept this through anything so flaccid as a recess appointment is beyond outrageous. It isn’t acceptable.

Let’s look, then, at what President Obama won’t let the American electorate hear Dr. Berwick say in front of a committee of Congress. These excerpts are from past speeches and articles by Dr. Berwick:

“I cannot believe that the individual health care consumer can enforce through choice the proper configurations of a system as massive and complex as health care. That is for leaders to do.”

“You cap your health care budget, and you make the political and economic choices you need to make to keep affordability within reach.”

“Please don’t put your faith in market forces. It’s a popular idea: that Adam Smith’s invisible hand would do a better job of designing care than leaders with plans can.”

“Indeed, the Holy Grail of universal coverage in the United States may remain out of reach unless, through rational collective action overriding some individual self-interest, we can reduce per capita costs.”

“It may therefore be necessary to set a legislative target for the growth of spending at 1.5 percentage points below currently projected increases and to grant the federal government the authority to reduce updates in Medicare fees if the target is exceeded.”

“About 8% of GDP is plenty for ‘best known’ care.”

“A progressive policy regime will control and rationalize financing—control supply.”

“The unaided human mind, and the acts of the individual, cannot assure excellence. Health care is a system, and its performance is a systemic property.”

“Health care is a common good—single payer, speaking and buying for the common good.”

“And it’s important also to make health a human right because the main health determinants are not health care but sanitation, nutrition, housing, social justice, employment, and the like.”

“Hence, those working in health care delivery may be faced with situations in which it seems that the best course is to manipulate the flawed system for the benefit of a specific patient or segment of the population, rather than to work to improve the delivery of care for all. Such manipulation produces more flaws, and the downward spiral continues.”

“For-profit, entrepreneurial providers of medical imaging, renal dialysis, and outpatient surgery, for example, may find their business opportunities constrained.”

“One over-demanded service is prevention: annual physicals, screening tests, and other measures that supposedly help catch diseases early.”

“I would place a commitment to excellence—standardization to the best-known method—above clinician autonomy as a rule for care.”

“Health care has taken a century to learn how badly we need the best of Frederick Taylor [the father of scientific management]. If we can’t standardize appropriate parts of our processes to absolute reliability, we cannot approach perfection.”

“Young doctors and nurses should emerge from training understanding the values of standardization and the risks of too great an emphasis on individual autonomy.”

“Political leaders in the Labour Government have become more enamored of the use of market forces and choice as an engine for change, rather than planned, centrally coordinated technical support.”

“The U.K has people in charge of its health care—people with the clear duty and much of the authority to take on the challenge of changing the system as a whole. The U.S. does not.”

***

There is no need to rehearse the analogies in literature and social thought that Dr. Berwick’s ideas summon. That the Obama White House would try to push this past public scrutiny with a recess appointment says more about Barack Obama than it does Dr. Berwick.

Vilifying Dr. Berwick alone for his views is in a way beside the point. Within Mr. Obama’s circle they all think like this. Defeat Dr. Berwick, and they will send up 50 more who would pursue the same goals.

If the American people want the world Dr. Berwick wishes to give them, that’s their choice. But they must be given that choice with full, televised confirmation hearings.

Barack Obama, Donald Berwick and the rest may fancy themselves philosopher kings who know what we need without the need to inform or persuade us first. That’s not how it works here. That is Sen. Baucus’s point.

It should be clear why Berwick is bigger than Kagan. We need a large public debate over these views, over what Mr. Obama has said his health plan would and would not do. We need to find out if every Democrat in Congress and every Democrat writing newspaper columns and blogs agrees with Dr. Berwick about clinical and individual autonomy and about leaders with plans.

Then we need to build an election around whether we want to go down the road Dr. Berwick has planned for us, or start dismantling the one that President Obama paved through Congress on a partisan vote.

Read Full Post »

The NRA’s “true champion of the Second Amendment” has added yet another piece of idiocy to his lengthy list of canards.  Nevada’s dismal Democrat Senator Harry Reid, who called the income tax voluntary, the passage of the ObamaCare bill open and transparent, the Elena Kagan nomination to the Supreme Court a good choice, and energy consumption taxes in the cap and trade bill a good thing, has flatly denied that illegal aliens work in the construction business in his state.  

Even though an April 2009 Pew Hispanic Center study shows that Nevada’s labor force has 12.2 percent “unauthorized immigrants”– more than twice the national average – the NRA darling told a reporter, “That may be someplace, but it’s not here in Nevada. [And] any information you have in that regard is absolutely without foundation.”

Instead of contributing to an organization that is joined at the hip with a duplicitous, underhanded skunk like Harry Reid, members should channel their membership dues to Republican candidate Sharron Angle and unseat the unsavory Reid this November in Nevada.

I.M. Kane


 

Reid: No illegal construction workers in my state

By Chelsea Schilling

“That may be someplace, but it’s not here in Nevada.”—Harry Reid, Democrat Majority Leader of the U.S. Senate

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid claims there are no illegal aliens working in the construction business in Nevada – the same U.S. state that is reported to have the highest percentage of “unauthorized immigrants” in the labor force.

Responding to a Pew Hispanic Center study that shows 17 percent of all construction workers are in the U.S. illegally, Reid told Las Vegas 8NewsNow, “That may be someplace, but it’s not here in Nevada.”

The statement came as a reporter questioned Reid about his successful effort blocking a 2009 amendment introduced by Republican Sen. Jeff Sessions that would have required construction companies contracted for stimulus projects to use E-Verify – a computer program that determines whether prospective employees are U.S. citizens.

Reid did not allow the amendment to come up for a vote. Instead, he argues that the nation must reform its immigration policy.

Explaining his grounds for blocking the vote, Reid told the news station, “The reason: We need to do comprehensive immigration reform. We cannot do it piecemeal.”

The reporter told Reid, “When you go to the unemployment office there’s many U.S. citizens who are unemployed construction workers and they don’t have specific jobs because, right now, some of those construction companies find it easier to hire undocumented workers.”

Reid replied, “I think that any information you have in that regard is absolutely without foundation.”   

According to the April 2009 Pew Hispanic Center study, 170,000 workers, or 12.2 percent of Nevada’s total, are illegal aliens – more than twice the national average of 5.4 percent.

The Washington-based think tank also estimates 230,000 illegal aliens live in Nevada and that one in 10 children in Nevada K-12 schools has a parent who is an illegal alien.

Reid’s office told the news station E-Verify is inaccurate.

But the news agency noted the federal government’s own contracted accountant reported that E-Verify had an efficiency rate of 99 percent. The report called that rate “an astounding affirmation of the accuracy and efficiency of the system.”

Read Full Post »